<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thereaderonline.co.uk/2008/05/the-death-of-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thereaderonline.co.uk/2008/05/the-death-of-criticism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://thereaderonline.co.uk/2008/05/the-death-of-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereaderonline.co.uk/?p=395#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>Your optimism is infectious, but I&#039;ve built up a resistance I think. It&#039;s not that there isn&#039;t interesting and lively work going on, but demographics are a huge drag on development and have been for going on a couple of decades now. In the UK the number of jobs advertised in English each month in the trade papers is down to one or two at best, nationally--not enough to revitalise it. I agree many of these people are now blogging, so criticism is probably healthy enough in itself. I hope you&#039;re right anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your optimism is infectious, but I&#8217;ve built up a resistance I think. It&#8217;s not that there isn&#8217;t interesting and lively work going on, but demographics are a huge drag on development and have been for going on a couple of decades now. In the UK the number of jobs advertised in English each month in the trade papers is down to one or two at best, nationally&#8211;not enough to revitalise it. I agree many of these people are now blogging, so criticism is probably healthy enough in itself. I hope you&#8217;re right anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Maitzen</title>
		<link>http://thereaderonline.co.uk/2008/05/the-death-of-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Maitzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereaderonline.co.uk/?p=395#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>There has been some interesting related discussion at the academic blog The Valve (http://thevalve.org), which in itself is, I think, evidence of some energetic activity among younger literary scholars (and even some, like me, who might not qualify as &#039;younger&#039; anymore!).  Blogging itself, in fact, is one way some academics are expanding the range and form of their criticism.  Despite recent books like Ronan McDonald&#039;s &quot;The Death of the Critic,&quot; then, there are signs of life.  (Also, of course, some would dispute the initial premise that what currently goes on within the universities and in academic publishing is not, in its own right, lively.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been some interesting related discussion at the academic blog The Valve (<a href="http://thevalve.org" rel="nofollow">http://thevalve.org</a>), which in itself is, I think, evidence of some energetic activity among younger literary scholars (and even some, like me, who might not qualify as &#8216;younger&#8217; anymore!).  Blogging itself, in fact, is one way some academics are expanding the range and form of their criticism.  Despite recent books like Ronan McDonald&#8217;s &#8220;The Death of the Critic,&#8221; then, there are signs of life.  (Also, of course, some would dispute the initial premise that what currently goes on within the universities and in academic publishing is not, in its own right, lively.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>



